A recent lawsuit filed in Charleston claims that the Capitol mural project in West Virginia is illegal and seeks to have the murals removed and restitution paid. The lawsuit alleges that the project violates the state’s constitution due to the use of public funds without proper authorization.
The Capitol mural project began in 2016 and was meant to depict West Virginia’s history. However, the lawsuit argues that the project was not approved by the state legislature and did not go through the proper channels for funding. The lawsuit claims that approximately $1.5 million was spent on the project, which is deemed unlawful.
The lawsuit was filed by the West Virginia chapter of the NAACP, the Association for the Study of African American Life and History, and other individuals. They are seeking to have the murals removed from the Capitol building and for the state to pay restitution for the funds used on the project.
In response to the lawsuit, the Department of Administration, which oversaw the Capitol mural project, stated that they believe the project was legal and in compliance with state laws. They argue that the funding for the project was approved by the state legislature and that the murals are an important part of West Virginia’s history.
The outcome of the lawsuit remains to be seen, but it has sparked debate over the legality of the Capitol mural project. Supporters of the project argue that it is a valuable artistic and educational resource, while critics believe that it was improperly funded and should be removed. The case is expected to have significant implications for the future of the Capitol mural project and public art in West Virginia.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com