In a recent article for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, sports writer Jason Mackey reflected on the exciting matchup between Penn State and West Virginia, highlighting the rivalry and tradition between the two schools. While Mackey acknowledged the thrill of watching these two teams compete, he argued that this game should only be a small part of each school’s yearly regional schedule.
Mackey suggested that Penn State and West Virginia should play each other just once every three years, allowing for more diversity in their matchups and opportunities to play against different opponents. He pointed out that both schools have historic rivalries with other teams in the region that should not be overshadowed by an annual matchup between Penn State and West Virginia.
Mackey’s article sparked a discussion among sports fans about the importance of maintaining balance in a team’s schedule and ensuring that all rivalries are given equal importance. Some agreed with his sentiment, emphasizing the need for variety in matchups to keep the regional college football scene exciting and engaging for fans.
Overall, Mackey’s perspective on the Penn State-West Virginia matchup highlighted the rich tradition and history between the two schools while also pointing out the importance of maintaining a diverse schedule to showcase all regional rivalries. As the debate continues, it will be interesting to see how college football teams in the region adjust their schedules to accommodate the views of fans and sports analysts like Jason Mackey.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com