Israel’s recent bombings in Lebanon have raised questions about the country’s military response. Despite the ongoing attacks, Lebanon’s military has largely stayed out of the conflict, leaving many to wonder why they have not intervened to protect their people. In most countries, a government’s failure to defend its citizens would be met with criticism, but Lebanon’s situation is unique.
Soraya Lennie, a prominent journalist, delves into the complexities of Lebanon’s military stance amid the bombings. She highlights the various factors at play, including historical conflicts, political instability, and regional power dynamics. Lennie suggests that Lebanon’s military may be hesitant to engage in the conflict due to a combination of internal and external pressures.
The article explores the longstanding tensions between Lebanon and Israel, as well as the influence of other regional players such as Iran and Syria. Lennie argues that Lebanon’s military may be wary of escalating the situation further, potentially leading to a broader conflict that could devastate the country.
Lennie also touches on the fragile political landscape in Lebanon, where sectarian divisions and power struggles have long plagued the government. This internal turmoil could be another reason why the military has been reluctant to intervene in the face of Israeli aggression.
Overall, the article sheds light on the complex dynamics at play in Lebanon and offers insights into why the military has chosen to stay out of the conflict. As the bombings continue to threaten the safety and security of Lebanese citizens, the role of the country’s military remains a topic of debate and scrutiny.
Source
Photo credit www.aljazeera.com